A base rate summarizes how outcomes typically distribute for a broad class: average returns, drawdowns, failure rates, and recovery times. Instead of asking whether your pick is special, begin by asking what usually happens. SPIVA studies show most active funds lag benchmarks over long windows, a sobering starting point for expectations.
Define a group your investment genuinely belongs to by business model, size, profitability, leverage, geography, and age. A pre-revenue biotech lives in a different world than a mature utility. Reference classes turn one seductive story into many comparable histories, grounding assumptions with ranges of outcomes, not wishful single-point guesses.
The inside view fixates on vivid details about your specific idea; the outside view asks how similar ideas usually fare. When Maya chased a flashy IPO, she paused to check the base rate for recently listed, unprofitable tech. Seeing frequent drawdowns and long breakeven times, she sized smaller and slept better.

Examine long-run results for simple benchmarks such as a global equity index, a 60/40 stock-bond mix, or small-cap value. Note average returns, bad years, worst drawdowns, and time to recovery. These base rates create expectation bands that prevent overreaction to headlines and keep contributions steady during frightening markets.

Expense ratios, trading spreads, slippage, and taxes compound relentlessly, turning good-looking backtests into mediocre real outcomes. Use conservative assumptions and let them bite your forecast before reality does. A small difference in annual cost can erase years of effort; base rates rarely forgive casual underestimation of friction.

Replace single-number predictions with ranges anchored in percentile outcomes from your reference class. Plan for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile paths, and link savings, spending, and rebalancing rules to each. This approach turns uncertainty from a threat into a navigable map with multiple safe routes.
All Rights Reserved.